As many of our readers know, The California Supreme Court has decided to review a couple key medical marijuana regulation cases, meaning cities and towns in CA that want to ban dispensaries no longer have a legal reason to do so.

The patient advocacy group Americans For Safe Access sent out an email yesterday, detailing the cases and linking to a downloadable letter patients can use with their local governments and boards in California.

Americans for Safe Access (ASA) scored a big victory this week when the California Supreme Court agreed to review Pack v. Long Beach and Riverside v. Inland Empire Patient’s Health and Wellness Center. The Pack decision held that some dispensary regulations may be preempted by federal law, and the Riverside decision held that localities could legally ban distribution altogether. ASA, together with the American Civil Liberties Union, filed an amicus brief in the case asking the Supreme Court to review these cases to help preserve local regulation and safe access for patients statewide.

ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford wrote a short letter explaining the significance of the Supreme Court decision in the Pack case. Download a copy of Joe’s letter and share it with your City Council or Board of Supervisors at their next meeting. This is especially important if your city or county is moving to ban patients’ associations or suspend regulations. You can get help organizing turn out at public meetings and speaking in public from ASA’s free Online Advocates Training Center.

Our victory in securing the Supreme Court’s review could not have come at a better time. Some cities and counties have used these decisions as an excuse to ban patients’ cooperatives and collectives or to stop existing permitting schemes. The decision to review these cases means they are no longer binding – and there is no legal necessity to ban patients associations, repeal existing regulations, or stall on issuing licenses or permits. The Supreme Court may not rule on Pack or Riverside for a long time (maybe years). Until then, cities and counties are not prevented from upholding the voters mandate in Proposition 215 “to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana.”

We cannot allow cities and counties to use Pack or Riverside as excuses to block safe access to medicine. Research conducted by ASA and experience since 1996 show that sensible regulations reduce crime and complaints around cooperatives and collectives, while preserving patients’ access. We don’t know the ultimate outcome at the Supreme Court, but until we do, we need to keep insisting that our elected representatives do the right thing for patients and their communities – adopt and implement regulations.

Patients in CA are under assault from all sides and they need all the help they can get. Now, more than ever, patients in CA need activists and advocates to stand up and say enough is enough. Access is being severely restricted and patients are being treated like criminals.

Is this how a so-called “compassionate society” acts?

- Joe Klare

And be sure to check out our Open Letter on Behalf of 30 Million Cannabis Users and join us in our fight!