jump to ezvaporizers.com

Cannabis, Politics, and Scientific Revisionism

It seems like it was just yesterday that I wrote an article here on The 420 Times about how great it was that the U.S. Government was starting to publicly acknowledge some of the benefits of cannabis (a.k.a. medical marijuana). Oh, wait…it was just yesterday.

In an amazing, almost real-time drama, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), mentioned prominently in the article, has now removed some content from their own website, replacing it with less-controversial language. This might be understandable if we were talking about an embarrassing goof on a government political website, but NCI is a leading resource for physicians, patients, researchers, and other scientists.

“I was so excited, but also surprised, that the government was finally telling the truth about the many anti-tumor effects of marijuana that I outlined in my film, What if Cannabis Cured Cancer“. I was angry, but not surprised, that the National Cancer Institute took their own quote off their official website within hours of it appearing. The truth slipped out, oops, somebody’s going to get fired. I guess big pharma got to them. The pharmaceutical industry funds most cancer websites in this country. Profits come first in the war on cancer as it’s fought in the United States of Corporations”. — Len Richmond, filmmaker

So what was so controversial? Very simple, and simply chilling in its implications.

The first version mentioned that doctors were using cannabis with their cancer patients for a number of reasons, including anti-nausea, pain relief, and antitumor effects.

The second “sanitized” version not only left out the bit about fighting tumors, but also changed the entire tone of the paragraph to imply that cannabis is only useful for comforting cancer patients, and nothing else.

Here’s The Smoking Gun

Original Version:

“The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. In the practice of integrative oncology, the health care provider may recommend medicinal Cannabis not only for symptom management but also for its possible direct antitumor effect.”

Today’s Version:

“The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living with cancer include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. Though no relevant surveys of practice patterns exist, it appears that physicians caring for cancer patients who prescribe medicinal Cannabis predominantly do so for symptom management.”

What Does This Mean?

Back in the 1960s, Americans reveled in our freedoms and made fun of the poor Soviet people, who were insulated from the outside world by a government who controlled all media and was known for changing its official version of history. Politicians who fell out of favor with the government leaders, or the prevailing political mood at the time, were erased from official photographs and sent off to Siberia. We thanked our lucky stars that we lived in a free, open society where those sorts of things didn’t happen.

But we were wrong…we just didn’t know it.

Now, apparently, we live in a country which is approaching, in some ways, the dystopia described in George Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four, in which Winston Smith, working at the Ministry Of Truth, would change the content of old newspapers to reflect the official government position on any particular subject. In effect, though the Internet wasn’t dreamed of in Orwell’s day, he was doing the equivalent of changing the content of what had already been written…a textbook example of (literal) revisionism.

Senate House UoL Cannabis, Politics, and Scientific Revisionism
The Original Ministry Of Truth (George worked here)

When scientists are forced to change the truth (as published, anyway), it means that we’re now living in a world much like Soviet Russia, where Pravda is the only allowed newspaper, so that what it says must be right. It means we’re stuck in the 1984 of Orwell’s fears…where some anonymous person in an anonymous office is told to rewrite the facts, because the facts conflict with what Big Brother wants you to know.

And Big Brother does not want you to know about cannabis. Big Brother wants you to keep thinking that cannabis is dangerous and will lead your children to perdition…just like the way they lied in 1937 to make it illegal in the first place. Big Brother does not want you to know about the medical research done since then, proving that cannabis alleviates or outright cures literally dozens of diseases, ailments, and mental and emotional conditions. Big Brother does not want you to know about Granny Storm Crow’s list comprising hundreds of pages of links to this proven medical research. Big Brother does not want you to know how Rick Simpson cured cancer using nothing but cannabis oil. Big Brother does not want you to know about Len Richmond’s film about curing cancer with cannabis.

And most of all, Big Brother does not want you to know that Big Brother knows that cannabis can cure cancer, and that Big Brother himself suppressed the news, sentencing untold millions of people to an early and painful death.

And now Big Brother is controlling scientists and telling them what to say and what not to say.

The 420 Times would like to thank Len Richmond for supplying the before-and-after and personal quotes.

Old Hippie is a MMJ patient living somewhere in the wilds of California whose only link with the real world is a 420 MHz radio. He blogs on BeyondChronic.com and vapes on Sour Diesel.

Filed Under: 420 Times ExclusivesActivismExclusive Web ContentMedical Marijuana NewsPolitics

  • R. Grubb

    We caught the Smithsonian redacting references to Hemp in paper (USD bills are 24%). When we called them on the Hemp (missing), information they replied they “didn’t want to send conflicting messages”. Regarding the war on drugs in general, and the war on American Hemp crops in particular I presume.
    I have begun referring our epoch as “The Dark Age”.

  • Rockland Steel

    In the fight over cannabis and the making of it illegal, in the first place,it is listed as a class one drug,that is where you all need to start your fight,in court,proving it as been mislabled and have it relabled,in court by law as a class 3or4 class drug. like cigs or beer.after all Im not sick, I don;t need medical cannabis i don;t want to brake the law even if i thank its wrong! I just want to go to the store and buy som weed and beer and go home and get high is that realy so bad?

  • Michelle Sexton

    I have to admit that I am sometimes disturbed by the alarmist type of publicity that emanates from the Cannabis community at large. As a scientist, my observation is that change in policy often comes slowly, and with adequate evidence. The NCI has made a bold move to acknowledge Cannabis as a CAM (complementary alternative medicine)! From a clinical perspective, while there may be an abundance of anecdotal evidence from patients and doctors regarding ‘cure’, the gold standard for science is the randomized controlled clinical trial. There are none of these that exist for Cannabis as a treatment for cancer. Maybe by acknowledging the forward strides by government agencies and making informed and rational comments regarding inconsistencies or errors, these agencies that fund the very studies that many of us would like to conduct will be persuaded. Maybe those who are publishing this type of rhetoric will actually sign their name to it, as I sign mine.
    Michelle Sexton ND

  • http://tinyurl.com/classactionlawsuit Jose Melendez

    I’ll sign my real name and note that researchers complain that randomized controlled clinical trials using cannabis are stymied unless the study seeks to find harmful effects.

    Here is one that was allowed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11362160

    The facts are that federal law claims cannabis and cannabinoids are classified in Schedule I with drugs that have “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision”, yet the Department of Health and Human Services was assigned a patent entitled “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants.”

    That the National Cancer Institute should admit, then retract a statement of “possible direct antitumor effect” while millions have been arrested on the false grounds that cannabis has no medical effect is more evidence that policy is driven by ideology, not science.

    Rhetoric? Please. Marijuana prohibition is clearly illegal, and anyone who was ever arrested for it ought to sue.

  • Bernie Ellis, MA, MPH

    Actually, Michelle, you need to spend some time with PubMed before making such a blanket and ill-informed statement. The research on the use of cannabinoids in treating gliomas and glioblastomas coming out of Spain for the past decade is quite compelling. In addition, cannabinoids have shown potent anti-tumor effects on at least another half dozen cancer cell lines in vitro. Almost all of this research is being conducted overseas but it is still readily available at PubMed.

    We have now had two peer-reviewed scientific journal articles published PER DAY for the past 20 years on the beneficial medical uses of cannabis and cannabinoids and yet we still have people saying there’s not been enough research. (Reminds me of the arguments the tobacco industry used to make about their product having not been proven scientifically to cause cancer.) If the “drug worriers” were to step aside and allow science, common sense and compassion to regain their rightful positions within the practice of medicine and medical research, we would all be better off.

    For the betterment of man (and woman) kind, I hope we transition all DEA agents into grade school crossing guards as soon as possible (but not before disarming them first).

  • John

    Well said Bernie Ellis. Michelle’s thought process on paper is vague and misleading. Apparently Big Brother has already gotten to her. If we leave it up to Govt or Pharmas to actually fund research on cannabis, we will never know the truth because the only thing they truly want is any and all harmful affects of cannabis. With that ideology in mind, research will continually appear weak on theories because they have yet to show any harmful affects. If there are no harmful affects, the results will be few in number. If science were able to be funded to do the full spectrum of analyses, good and bad, we would then be able to piece together the truth, good or bad, about cannabis. So far, it appears that type of research is only approved overseas and look at the results they are publicizing. I have yet to read any nonfavorable results and the true medicinal value is creating a wealth of information to be viewed by all. It’s a shame our own government is so corrupted by greed and power that they willingly bury the scientific evidence that would assist millions who are in need of one proven medicine, cannabis, vs. many synthetic pills that only cover up the symptoms and create other, more dangerous ailments. I personally do not have a need for medicinal marijuana but I do have stress, back pain from scoliosis and have difficulty sleeping. With the use of marijuana, my stress is never an issue. The scoliosis is barely noticeable and I sleep like a baby. This is, of couse, self prescribed but I feel millions more who wouldn’t qualify for medicinal marijuana could definitely benefit from the soothing affects of marijuana. In my opinion, legalizing medical marijuana doesn’t go far enough to aid people of the world. Total legalization for all is the only approach that will help everyone except Big Brother and the Big Pharmas. I can live with that.
    And Bernie, as funny as your statement is about the DEA, I totally agree. I’ve been pushing for total disbanding of the DEA for years now. And, as a personal note, any DEA agent who goes after pot smokers with the intent to hurt or kill should be sentenced to life in prison with no hope of parole. They are just using the law as a means to eradicate pot smokers. I consider them to be nothing more than murderers. We don’t need them in society.

  • Old Hippie

    While I’m surely not against you, John, I couldn’t help thinking after reading your comment…nobody should have to “qualify” for medical marijuana. It’s an herb that anyone should be able to grow in their own garden without fuss…like chamomile, catnip, and other medicinals that people have been using for thousands of years to improve their health or help calm themselves down.

  • John

    Old Hippie, I’m right there with you. I hate to even think about having to qualify to partake of an herb that grows wild around the world. If I think too hard about it, I start to stress. But then I just nip it in the BUD.

  • Pingback: How The Federal Government Lies About Everything

Featuring Recent Posts Wordpress Widget development by YD